What is Subsidiary as a service?

A Subsidiary is a company controlled by a holding company in another region. Because it has complementary operations of the parent company, as the ideal nearby extension for innovation, testing & developing new delivery practices with more agility and competitive costs.

Subsidiary as a Service is a framework for your operation which has a similar approach as a Software as a Service (Saas) Model:

  1. Obtain the benefits immediately. Companies donโ€™t need to wait months to start benefiting from the solution, they can start in days for a faster time to market.
  2. Less expensive. With Saas, the startup cost goes down abruptly as you donโ€™t have to install infrastructure or hire an inhouse team to support it. By sharing common resources, you donโ€™t need to hire local specialists full time, you use specialist as needed, as a shared service.
  3. Scale when is needed. Donโ€™t need to buy the full solution and a package of users that you donโ€™t know when you will start using each functionality and how many users you will actually use. Adjust accordingly with our economy of scale.
  4. Shorter contracts. Not sure of a long-term commitment, sign shorter periods and pay monthly as it is used.
  5. Any company has access to it. Saas was created so Small & Medium Enterprises could access the solution benefits that the big corporations have (more on M&A Alternatives)

Subsidiary as a Service has the added advantage that is a safer path when entering a new geography, as Everscale minimizes potential risks & liabilities of the region. 

Everscale enables a unique framework for a strategic Subsidiary with full capabilities, which includes a scalable local operation team with industry savvy executives for GTM strategies. It can add delivery teams with different engagement models. 

When a Subsidiary-as-a-Service is recommended

  • When the company is not ready to commit to a certain market for more than 5 years.
  • Planning to start the operations with less than 20 employees.
  • Need a team and resources quickly, instead of waiting 2-3 months.
  • Prefer to pilot the region, before investing a large expansion budget.
  • Need temporary capabilities in other technologies.
  • You need industry specific knowledge for Sales Executives or Consultants, that a Regular PEO doesnโ€™t provide.

Subsidiary as a service benefits

  • Scale as you grow.
  • Pilot the region first.
  • Stay nimble by leveraging our economies of scale.

Alternatives for starting an operation in a new region:

Subsidiary as a Service as an M&A Alternative

Todayโ€™s trends in M&A, reflect that companies are seeking to be more innovative and responsive to customer needs, but they need to stay agile. The challenge is how to add new business practices to realize these objectives under frameworks that work best for each industry.

โ€œGrow beyond standard business models โ€“ An Alternative on M&Aโ€ examines the use of alternatives to enter a new market and adding business capabilities for growth.  It uses a current example of a company operating in this new niche, born in the heart of the digital transformation economy.

References

โ€œHow the Partner Ecosystem is Evolving in the Digital Economyโ€

IDC Directions 2017

โ€œBuilding scalable Business Modelsโ€

MIT Sloan, December 2017

โ€œEvaluate Offshore/Nearshore Countries for Outsourcing, Shared Services and Captives Worldwideโ€

Gartner, July 2017

โ€œHow to Successfully Transition from BPO to BPaaS, Digital Services and Automationโ€

Gartner Market Insight, March 2017

โ€œStrategic Alliances as an alternative to M&A? Driving growth through strategic alliancesโ€

KPMG Strategic alliances Survey, 2017

โ€œDigital Growth Depends More on Business Models than Technologyโ€

Harvard Business Review, 2018

โ€œThe end of scaleโ€

MIT Sloan, February 2018

โ€œYour Path to Build new Solutions for Customers and Prospectsโ€

Hans Georg Uebe (Global Vice President Channel Development and Expansion at SAP), October 2019

โ€œThe Next Generation of SAP Partners and Cloud Business Modelsโ€

Interview to Karl Fahrbach, SAPโ€™s first-ever Chief Partner Officer, July 2019

โ€œPeer Networking as a Key to Digital Transformationโ€

John Scola, GVP SAP Global Channels Cloud & Strateg, October 2019

Share:

Comparing the BOT Model vs the As-a-Service Framework cove image

Comparing the BOT Model vs the As-a-Service Framework

For years, tech companies expanding offshore that were looking for the advisory of a local expert, favored the Buildโ€‘Operateโ€‘Transfer (BOT) model to launch Global Capability Centers (GCCs) or Shared Services Centers. The specialized vendor built the operation from scratchโ€”dedicated infrastructure, a new legal entity, admin staff hiring, policiesโ€”then stabilized it and transferred it to the client after a set term. Because the vendor assumes execution risk, BOT pricing typically includes a margin on top of the total operation (a % uplift). Itโ€™s more expensive than the Do-It-Yourself approach, but the premium is often justified: it reduces unknownโ€‘country risk and limits budget overruns with a turnkey, governed path to transfer.

Read more ยป

Financial Analysis of Starting Operations in Mexico: Cost, Risk, and Time-to-Value

For North American B2B tech companies, expanding into Mexico offers both cost savings and access to top talentโ€”but the approach matters. A DIY setup can be slow, risky, and expensive, while the Subsidiary-as-a-Service (SUBaaS) model delivers speed, compliance, and significant savings. By paying only for what they use, companies can reduce operational costs by up to 70%, avoid legal and compliance pitfalls, and launch in weeks instead of months. SUBaaS makes nearshore operations scalable, capex-friendly, and investor-approvedโ€”helping businesses stay lean and competitive in a volatile global economy.

Read more ยป

Whatโ€™s in a Name? GCC-as-a-Service, Micro Capability Center, GBS, CoEs, Subsidiary-as-a-Service, and More

Global expansion is no longer limited to large enterprisesโ€”but the terminology used to describe new foreign operations has become confusing. Are companies launching a Global Capability Center, a CoE, a Micro Capability Center, or simply a regional office? The distinction between frameworks like Subsidiary-as-a-Service (SUBaaS) and functions like GCC or GBS is often overlooked, slowing clarity and execution. As nearshore strategies in Mexico grow, Micro Capability Centersโ€”lean, agile teams under SUBaaSโ€”are emerging as the preferred model. Getting the terminology right ensures alignment, realistic expectations, and scalable growth.

Read more ยป